29 Aug, 2007
Index funds aim to construct investments that mimic the movements of an index of a particular financial market. The fund manager can accomplished this by setting up a mutual fund composed of stocks in the S&P 500, and by keeping the stocks in amounts equal to the proportions they represent as members of the index. The idea here is not to beat the S&P 500 but to match its performance with a mutual fund. Not a bad goal considering the S&P 500 averaged returns of 17.3% in the 1990s while mutual funds could only manage 13.9% during that same time period. Another advantage with these funds is the low expense ratios, which are the costs charged to shareholders. The Vanguard S&P 500 expense ratio, 0.18% in 2006, is less than one fifth the expense ratios of the average mutual fund.
Fixed income funds are mutual funds that seek to preserve a set income stream by investing in very secure investments like highly rated corporate bonds and government bonds. They can provide monthly income, diversify a portfolio, or a higher level of liquidity for the investor. These are generally lower risk investments with a lower return, but a return that can be counted on to remain, thus the term “fixed income fund.” Many of these funds also have expense ratios below 1%.
Asset manager funds seek to match investment with the lifestyle or risk-tolerance of the investor. For example, the more risk-tolerant the investor, the longer the investor has until retirement so that fund would be composed more of equity (stocks) and less of bonds that have a slower rate of return. As the investor becomes less risk-tolerant, that fund will become more composed of bonds and less of equity. These types of funds are usually more actively managed than, say, the index funds and can have higher expense ratios. This is true with Fidelity’s Asset Manager 85% (85% equity) at 0.87% in 2006 and Asset Manager 20% (20% equity) at 0.58% in 2006, respectively. Still, these ratios are lower than other types of mutual funds.
28 Aug, 2007
The stock market can be traced back to the late 1700s, in the infancy of the United States. Beginning in Philadelphia, the first American stock exchanged was founded in order to bolster commerce in this new world. Before long the New York Stock Exchange was born which soon gave rise to the New York Stock and Exchange Board which led the now frenetic pace that exists today on Wall Street.
Read the rest of this entry »
28 Aug, 2007
Determining risk allocations begins with identifying risks. Once the risks are identified, they should be categorized according to the probability of the risk and determine how significant the impact of such a risk would be. Obviously, risk allocation has some speculative nature to it but there is also a lot of established research with results widely available on the Internet. Any fund manager must allocate risk when determining the makeup of an investment fund, just as the individual should manage risk when determining what funds to invest in.
Various types of risks occur in everyday business operations including, credit risk, country risk, market risks, etc. However, the good fund manager will do a good job scrutinizing risks that may be more probable in his managed funds. For example, a fund manager overseeing a Latin American fund that includes Venezuelan assets would have to consider the recent seizures of private assets in his risk allocation. This might be the biggest risk in investing in Venezuela right now. Country risk must always be considered when investing in foreign funds.
Private investors can do their own risk allocation when researching investment funds. A little research can provide a level of fund risk management that is more responsive to changing markets. One of the tools fund managers use that is widely published on the Internet is beta. Beta is calculated through regression analysis and shows the tendency of a security’s returns to respond to market changes. Beta is less than 1, 1, or more than 1. A beta of 1 represents the volatility of the market itself. A beta more than 1 shows the fund to be more volatile than the market and a beta less than 1 shows the beta to be less volatile than the market. By putting beta to practical use an investor would want a fund with a beta greater than 1 during bull markets and a fund with a beta less than one during bear markets.
28 Aug, 2007
In the TSE (Tokyo Stock Exchange), the “Nikkei 225†is a market index which is the most important in the Asian stocks. Since 1971, this stock index has been calculated every day by the “Nihon Keizai Shimbun (Nikkei)†newspaper. Moreover, and besides being reviewed once every year, the Nikkei’s unit is the Yen.
After its introduction to the OSE (Osaka Securities Exchange), CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the SGX (Singapore Exchange, the Nikkei 225 has become an international ingredient in the stock exchange. One of its other major indexes is the “Topixâ€.
The highest average ever recorded of the Nikkei 225 in the 20th century was in 1989 (reaching 38,957.44 before closing at 38,915.87). In the 21st century, it reached right above 18.300 points.
To weight stock by the Nikkei 225, they are given equal weighting based on 50 yen per share. Such weighting is also influenced by removals, splits and addition of constituents. Since it reflects the overall market, there is no final weighting for the Nikkei 225.Review results of the Nikkei 225 are published every September with changes applied early October. Such changes are usually announced in the Japanese Nikkei newspaper plus appearing on the NNI. Whenever a stock is being replaced, the divisor is, afterwards, changed to make sure that there is a smooth transition of the stock index.